Summary of Reddit Comments on "Appgyver"

Appgyver Overview

• Appgyver is now SAP Build with three versions: Build Work Zone, Build Work Zone Standard, Build Work Zone Advanced.
• Some users find Appgyver to be powerful and capable of building various apps.
• Users mention features such as custom components, JavaScript capabilities, and the ability to choose backend services like Backendless, Firebase, Xano, etc.

Pros of Appgyver:

• Free to use.
• Powerful and capable of building various types of apps.
• Flexible in terms of backend services.
• Custom components and JavaScript can be very powerful.
• Can choose what backend to use.

Cons of Appgyver:

• Lack of SEO support.
• Some users find it complex and require time to master.
• SAP Build is considered expensive for small and medium businesses.

Comparison with FlutterFlow

• Some users recommend FlutterFlow over Appgyver due to pricing and responsiveness of the support team.
• FlutterFlow is praised for being cheap, user-friendly, and offering good UI and platform independence.

Pros of FlutterFlow:

• Affordable pricing.
• Responsive support team.
• User-friendly with good UI.
• Platform independence.
• Good for making web apps.
• Offers a variety of features like integration with Firebase, APIs, custom actions, and templates.

Cons of FlutterFlow:

• Migrating from Appgyver to FlutterFlow may pose challenges.
• User experiences may vary depending on the use case.

Other Alternatives

• Baserow is suggested for backend services if free service is important, allowing building databases like a spreadsheet and exposing an API.
• Draftbit is mentioned as a polished alternative to Appgyver with the ability to export clean code and building to React Native for mobile and web platforms.
• Pocketbase is briefly mentioned as an alternative.

Community and Development

• Some users express disappointment in the lack of acceleration in Appgyver development post SAP acquisition.
• Appgyver receives praise for potential and flexibility, especially with the ability to use any React Native component in builds.
• Some users highlight the need for improved tutorials, documentation, and community support for Appgyver.

Final Thoughts

• Appgyver is praised for its flexibility, power, and free usage, but criticisms include a lack of SEO support and complexities in certain functionalities.
• FlutterFlow is recommended for its affordability, user-friendliness, and variety of features.
• Users advise considering the specific use case when choosing between Appgyver, FlutterFlow, and other alternatives.
• The decision to choose a development platform should be based on project requirements, budget, and desired features.