Summary of Reddit Comments on "ChatGPT or Perplexity"

ChatGPT

• Some users find ChatGPT inaccurate and unreliable, especially with newer or specific topics.
• ChatGPT is praised for its ease of use, especially for basic tasks and brainstorming.
• It is highlighted that ChatGPT can be used for tutoring, creating practice tests, and sparring with students.
• ChatGPT is noted to be good for conversation, summarizing, and more nuanced tasks like connecting dots and brainstorming.
• Users mention issues with ChatGPT Hallucinating or providing inaccurate information, especially with higher versions like ChatGPT 5.
• A significant number of users prefer ChatGPT for certain tasks like coding, data analysis, and everyday conversations.
• ChatGPT Plus subscription is mentioned by users as offering neat organization of interactions with good results.
• ChatGPT is praised for its image/video generation capability.
• Users mention tracking traffic sources from AI engines like ChatGPT through various tools like StatCounter, Ahrefs, and custom dashboards in Google Spreadsheets.
• There is a discussion about AI tracker tools like RivalSee for personalized insights into AI search results.

Perplexity

• Perplexity is described as slower, buggy, and losing context, causing frustration for users.
• Some users suggest using Perplexity for research, checking references for factual accuracy, and providing more detailed answers.
• Perplexity Pro is commended for academic research and generating reports with well-founded answers.
• Perplexity Pro is criticized for producing lazy, short answers, having a limited knowledge cut-off, and not staying focused on topics.
• Users mention switching between different models on Perplexity Expanse for centralized management of prompts, roles, and threads.
• Pros and cons of using Perplexity over ChatGPT are discussed, with the former being seen as more factual and providing well-rounded responses.
• Perplexity is recommended for tasks like research, study, conversation, and fact-checking AI.
• Users prefer using Perplexity to fact-check information obtained from ChatGPT.
• A mixture of Perplexity's Sonar models and Claude Sonnet is praised by some users for a balanced approach.

Other Mentions

• Users share their strategies for tracking and monitoring AI citations, mentions, and click-throughs from platforms like Gemini, Grok, CoPilot, and Bard.
• There is discussion about SEO for AI (Geo), its implications, and skepticism about the need for dedicated SEO strategies for AI engines.
• Some tools and methods mentioned for tracking AI referrals include n8n workflow, UTM parameters, and reviewing referrers.
• Users discuss their experiences with AI traffic from sources like Matomo, GA4, and brand radar, highlighting the challenges of monitoring AI-generated traffic.

This summary provides insights into the pros and cons of using ChatGPT and Perplexity, user experiences, tracking tools for AI citations, and discussions around SEO for AI engines.