Mikrotik Router Comparison: RB5009, hEX S, hAP ax3

RB5009

Pros:

• Excellent performance on a 1G connection
• Handles nearly gigabit internet easily
• Supports advanced features like WireGuard and VLANs
• Solid with a UniFi Cloud Key for setups

Cons:

• Could use more 2.5G/10G ports
• May need an additional 10G/2.5G downstream switch for additional high-speed ports

hEX S

Pros:

• Good for lab use or under gigabit
• Decent performance and value

Cons:

• May not handle IPv6 traffic well
• Limited in handling more advanced features and setups

hAP ax3

Pros:

• FastTrack and FastPath support
• Affordable option with decent performance
• Good for basic home networking needs

Cons:

• WiFi issues reported with certain versions
• May not be as stable with certain updates

Other Reddit Comments:

• Recommendation to open and document wallplate cables to assess available cabling options throughout the home
• Suggestion to connect PS5 with a wired connection for gaming and overall network stability
• Options for utilizing coaxial cable for network connectivity using MoCA bridges
• Mentions of a possible bug with OVPN clients on mmips devices in ROS7.18
• Feedback on various features and improvements in the latest Mikrotik RouterOS release
• Mixed experiences and feedback on WiFi stability, bug fixes, security updates, and hardware support

Conclusion:

Based on the Reddit comments, the RB5009 seems to be a popular choice for its performance, stability, and advanced features. While the hEX S and hAP ax3 are budget-friendly options, they may have limitations in handling more complex setups or advanced features. It's important to consider specific requirements and use cases when choosing a Mikrotik router.